SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
G1 Business Conduct
Management of material impacts, risks and opportunities
Process for the double materiality assessment related to business conduct
ESRS 2 IRO-1 Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities
As part of the double materiality analysis, AddLife has identified a potential negative impact related to corporate culture and risks associated with the management of relationships with suppliers, as well as corruption and bribery. The materiality assessment has been based on a qualitative analysis through internal stakeholder dialogues regarding the subsidiaries’ operations and business relationships, a review of corruption risks according to established external corruption indices (CPI), and a risk assessment of suppliers via an independent third‑party platform for sustainability evaluation.
| MATERIAL IMPACT, RISK OR OPPORTUNITY | ||
| Corporate culture | Impact (potential, negative) | O |
| Management of relationships with suppliers | Risk | U, O |
| Corruption and bribery | Risk | U, O, D |
| Upstream (U), Own operation (O), Downstream (D) | ||
Corruption risks have been assessed as particularly elevated in certain markets in Eastern Europe compared with other markets where AddLife operates, as well as in dialogue and negotiations with customers in the public sector, where relationships between public and private actors in procurement situations entail increased exposure to undue influence.
Business conduct principles and corporate culture
G1-1 Business conduct policies and corporate culture
Code of Conduct and group-wide policies
AddLife is driven by a clear vision to improve people’s lives by being a leading and value-creating partner in Life Science. The Group’s subsidiaries work closely with customers in healthcare and research to offer advanced, high-quality solutions to patients and users. This entails a particular responsibility to act in compliance with laws and regulations, and with integrity, transparency and respect towards customers, partners, employees and society. The decentralised business model enables agility and local accountability but also requires shared values and principles in order to establish and promote a robust corporate culture.
The Group’s Code of Conduct provides practical guidance on how AddLife assumes responsibility and acts in day-to-day decisions and actions, in light of the Group’s vision and core values: simplicity, responsibility, commitment and innovation. During the reporting period, the Code of Conduct and the Supplier Code of Conduct were updated to align more clearly with international standards. The updates were adopted by the Board of Directors after the end of the financial year. In updating the Code of Conduct and the Supplier Code of Conduct, the interests of the Group’s key stakeholders were taken into account. These interests have been considered as part of the ongoing stakeholder dialogue conducted through the Group’s various channels, in which the expectations and views of key stakeholders are captured and taken into consideration. The Code of Conduct and the Supplier Code of Conduct are available to all stakeholders on AddLife’s website.
In addition to the Group’s Code of Conduct, AddLife governs its work on business ethics and compliance through additional group-wide policies. The policies are developed based on the outcome of the Group’s double materiality analysis, the strategic sustainability work and requirements from key stakeholders based on an ongoing dialogue. During the reporting period, AddLife developed the governing documents Sustainability Due Diligence Policy, Sustainable Sourcing Policy and Anti-Corruption Policy. The Anti-Corruption Policy was adopted by the Board of Directors during the reporting period, while the first two policies were adopted by the Board of Directors after the end of the financial year. The management of each subsidiary is responsible for implementing the policies locally, and the governing documents are made available through the Group’s internal channels and communicated to external parties through contractual terms and the Supplier Code of Conduct.
The table below summarises the group-wide policies that were in place during the reporting period. The Board of Directors approves all policies, and Group Management has ultimate responsibility for their implementation.
| Policy | Purpose | Scope | International Standards | ESRS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code of Coduct | To guide AddLife’s employees in their daily work by serving as an ethical compass. The Code of Conduct covers, among other things, business conduct, human rights, working conditions (including child labour and forced labour), work environment and anti-corruption. | • Employees and members of the Board of Directors in all subsidiaries• Third parties acting on behalf of AddLife | • UN Global Compact • UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights • ILO Core Conventions • OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises | E1, E2, E4, E5, S1, S2, S4, G1 |
| Supplier Code of Conduct | To set out minimum requirements and expectations regarding ethical conduct for AddLife’s business partners and suppliers, in accordance with applicable laws and internationally recognised standards on human rights, working conditions, business ethics, anti-corruption and the environment. | • Suppliers and other business partners • Sub-suppliers and distributors of these partners | • UN Global Compact • UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights • ILO Core Conventions • UN Convention on the Rights of the Child | E1, E2, E4, E5, S2, G1 |
| Anti-corruption policy | To prevent, detect and manage all forms of corruption and bribery, and to ensure that AddLife conducts its operations with integrity, transparency and in compliance with applicable laws. | • Employees and members of the Board of Directors in all subsidiaries• Third parties acting on behalf of AddLife | • UN Global Compact • OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises | G1 |
AddLife strengthens and monitors the effectiveness of the policies, as well as compliance with the international frameworks and standards to which the Group has committed, through several initiatives:
- AddLife Academy offers training in business ethics guidelines, leadership and core values through both digital and in-person courses. All employees complete the group-wide course on Vision and Corporate Philosophy.
- An annual employee survey is conducted to evaluate the corporate culture, and the results are used as a basis for improvement actions in each subsidiary.
- Ethical guidelines and a group-wide whistleblowing channel contribute to an open and transparent culture in which employees can report any violations anonymously.
- The Board of Directors and Group Management receive regular updates on changes in legislation and new requirements related to business ethics.
Whistleblowing channel
To enable and detect any potential irregularities, the Group has a group-wide whistleblowing channel for reporting suspected wrongdoing that affects the organisation, people, society or the environment. This may include suspected criminal acts, irregularities or breaches, such as conflicts of interest, fraud, corruption and bribery, environmental violations, deficiencies in the working environment and discrimination. The whistleblowing channel is provided by an external partner, and each case is handled in a manner that ensures an objective and independent review. The external platform ensures that reports are handled confidentially and anonymously by encrypting and deleting metadata. Reports are handled only by a limited number of designated individuals with a mandate to manage whistleblowing cases. It is also ensured that no person involved in the reported misconduct takes part in handling the investigation. Where necessary, external legal expertise is engaged, in particular in cases of suspected criminal activity, and serious matters are escalated to Group Management and the Board of Directors. The whistleblowing channel is available to both employees and external stakeholders via the Group’s website. In addition to the whistleblowing channel, employees can always report problems or concerns to their immediate manager or to the Group function.
The use of the whistleblowing channel is monitored through a compilation of reported cases and actions taken, which is reported to Group Management and the Board of Directors. In the most recent employee survey, 93 percent of employees stated that they are aware of the channel and how to report, which overall indicate a strong confidence in the whistleblowing mechanism.
Sustainability due diligence in the supply chain
G1-2 Management of relationships with suppliers
AddLife, through its subsidiaries, cooperates with a broad network of suppliers and strives for long-term, responsible business relationships in which the Group, together with its business partners, works to reduce negative impacts and risks, as well as to capture opportunities in the supply chain. This work aims to create competitive advantages for suppliers and increased value for customers, and is becoming increasingly strategic as sustainability requirements from customers in both the private and public sectors are strengthened.
The subsidiaries are responsible for and manage the operational relationships with suppliers. At Group level, AddLife defines common frameworks and ways of working and provides the subsidiaries with relevant tools to help them adapt their operations in a structured and efficient manner to changing customer requirements and new legislation. The management of relationships with suppliers is based on the Group’s Code of Conduct and Supplier Code of Conduct, which form the basis for the joint commitment of the Group and its suppliers to maintain a sustainable supply chain. In the coming years, the Group will ensure that suppliers with significant purchasing volumes sign the Supplier Code of Conduct and, in dialogue with these suppliers, will initiate systematic work to evaluate the effectiveness of the commitments, within the Group’s sustainability due diligence in the supply chain.
During the reporting period, a number of selected subsidiaries have participated in a pilot project to implement the Group-wide process of sustainability due diligence in the supply chain, with a focus on suppliers with a elevated risk of negative impact. The subsidiaries have been selected based on customer requirements, capacity and maturity, and operate primarily in Northern and Western Europe. The process is based on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The purpose of the pilot project has been to identify tools and methods that are appropriate for implementation in AddLife’s decentralised organisation, in which the subsidiaries have different preconditions for conducting sustainability work in the supply chain based on their respective markets and operations.
Below is a description of how the Group has structured the process of sustainability due diligence in the supply chain. During the reporting period, the work within the pilot project has primarily focused on the first step of the process, and the remaining steps will gradually be introduced over the coming years. In the coming years, AddLife also plans to clarify and further develop the design and scope of the grievance mechanism that is to be in place under the process in order to ensure appropriate remediation.
1. Identify and assess supplier-specific sustainability issues.
AddLife conducts an initial risk assessment of all suppliers based on purchasing volume, geographic market, industry and other publicly available information about the supplier, via an independent third-party platform for sustainability evaluation. Suppliers with elevated risk are asked to complete a self-assessment questionnaire, which forms the basis for the continued assessment.
2. Take action to address identified sustainability issues among suppliers with elevated risk.
Based on the initial risk assessment, the subsidiaries, in dialogue with suppliers that remain at an elevated risk level, are to develop action plans with the aim of addressing the identified sustainability issues. Where necessary, the subsidiaries will support the suppliers in implementing the action plans.
3. Ongoing follow-up of actions implemented in dialogue with suppliers.
The action plans will be followed up jointly with the suppliers as part of the existing dialogue, and the suppliers’ risk level will be re-evaluated after approximately one year.
Initially, the most material and strategic areas will be prioritised in the dialogue and in the action plans, but the process will be applicable to all material sustainability matters that have been identified as part of the Group’s double materiality analysis, in order to proactively manage negative impacts and risks in the upstream value chain. Each subsidiary is responsible for implementing the process for sustainability due diligence in the supply chain in its own operations and for managing the operational dialogue with its suppliers, customers and other stakeholders. At Group level, AddLife communicates the Group’s objectives, activities and outcomes through the annual sustainability report.
Prevention of corruption and bribery
G1-3 Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery
Process for preventing corruption and bribery
AddLife has zero tolerance for corruption and bribery, as set out in the Group’s Code of Conduct and Anti-Corruption Policy. To reduce the risk of irregularities and ensure compliance, AddLife has established the following governance and practices:
- Clear guidelines for ethical business conduct through the company’s Code of Conduct and Anti-Corruption Policy.
- Anonymous and confidential reporting of suspected corruption or other breaches through the Group’s external whistleblowing channel.
- Business ethics requirements that are integrated into supplier agreements and communicated through the company’s Supplier Code of Conduct.
- Anti-bribery management systems in subsidiaries operating in markets with a higher risk of corruption.
Communication of anti-corruption and anti-bribery policies
The Anti-Corruption Policy, which was adopted during the reporting period, will be communicated and implemented over the coming years. During the reporting period, the Group has offered, through AddLife Academy, training in business ethics guidelines, leadership, the company’s values and the Code of Conduct, including guidelines for business ethics and good business practice, to all employees and members of the Board of Directors.
Metrics and targets
Targets related to business conduct
AddLife’s objectives related to business ethics have been developed based on the Group’s Code of Conduct and aim to ensure responsible operations with respect for human rights and sound business ethics in all business relationships throughout the value chain. The objectives have been defined at Group level for the entire business and have been adopted by the Board of Directors, without the involvement of other stakeholders. Progress against the objectives is followed up annually by Group Management and local management teams and form the basis for local actions.
Strategic objective: Engage AddLife’s suppliers
Sustainable Supply chain
AddLife strives, together with the Group’s partners, to reduce risks and negative impacts and to capture opportunities in the supply chain.
Target (2030): Engage 90 percent of AddLife’s suppliers with elevated sustainability risk.
The strategic objective related to sustainability in the supply chain relates to AddLife’s material risk associated with the management of relationships with suppliers, as well as the environmental and social impacts identified in the upstream value chain. During the reporting period, outcomes for the key performance indicator were not monitored or reported. Instead, the Group has focused on establishing the structures, processes and ways of working needed to measure and evaluate target achievement over time. This includes initiating the project and activities described under “Sustainability due diligence in the supply chain” in this chapter. These efforts form the basis for, going forward, systematically monitoring the proportion of AddLife’s suppliers with elevated sustainability risk that are engaged in line with the long-term objective for 2030.
Other business conduct objectives
In addition to the strategic objective, AddLife also monitors a number of other key performance indicators to track impacts and risks related to compliance and the principles of the Code of Conduct. These other key performance indicators are integrated into the metrics presented below and include objectives to:
- Zero tolerance for corruption, bribery and non-compliance, which is evaluated through the key performance indicator “G1‑4 Confirmed cases of corruption and bribery”. The outcome for the period and comparative figures are presented below under the metrics relating to corruption and bribery.
- All employees must complete AddLife’s training in the Code of Conduct. The outcome for the period and comparative figures are presented in the table below.
| Objective | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
| Proportion of employees who have completed AddLife’s training in the Code of Conduct, %1) | 92 | 92 | 97 |
| 1) Constitute the accumulated proportion of employees at the end of the period. Collected via AddLife’s Learning Management System (LMS). | |||
Metrics related to corruption and bribery
G1-4 Incidents of corruption or bribery
During the reporting period, there were no convictions and no fines were imposed for breaches of anti-corruption legislation. Information on corruption and bribery has been collected based on reports from the subsidiaries and a review of the Group’s other reporting channels. AddLife works continuously to strengthen the Group’s control systems and to ensure consistent and transparent reporting of matters related to corruption and bribery.
| Corruption and briberyr1) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
| Number of convictions or breaches of laws against corruption and bribery | - | - | - |
| Fines for breaches of laws against corruption and bribery | - | - | - |
| 1) The information has not been validated by any external party other than within the scope of the statutory limited review. | |||